Research · VC & Analyst Reports

Back to sweep

Research sweep · deep · 1995 – 2026

Compounding Waves — How Each Tech Era Built the Substrate, and the Skills, for the Next

The compounding economic logic of three successive technology waves from January 1995 to May 2026 — internet disintermediation of distribution, software-defined platforms and cloud infrastructure, and the current AI/agentic systems wave — examining the technical, economic and human-skills dependencies that make each wave a precondition for the next, the new categories of work each wave created, and whether the relationship is best understood as cumulative compounding or as externalised costs harvested by later layers.

  • financial
  • academic
  • blogs
  • vc

Synthesised 2026-05-11

Narrative

The VC and analyst record across 1995–2026 is most coherently read as a succession of substrate-and-application pairs, each of which required the prior wave's infrastructure to exist. Andreessen's 2011 'Software Is Eating the World' essay, republished and re-examined by a16z in 2024 and 2026, captures the moment when the internet wave's outputs — payment rails, broadband penetration, cloud economics — had cheapened deployment sufficiently to enable the software-defined wave. The essay's own numbers (application hosting costs falling from $150,000 to $1,500 per month between 2000 and 2011) describe a cost-curve compression that made SaaS viable, and that same compression, now applied to GPU inference, is the structural question animating the current wave. By February 2026, Fortune and Morgan Stanley were describing AI as eating the software layer itself, with unstructured data (over 80% of enterprise information) as the new automation frontier — the precise category that required the preceding decade of cloud-era tooling to make tractable.

Sequoia's David Cahn provided the most cited quantitative framing of wave-three's structural problem. His September 2023 analysis required $200B in annual end-user revenue to justify then-current GPU capex; by June 2024 that figure had risen to $600B, tracking Nvidia's revenue acceleration. Bain's sixth annual technology report (September 2025) independently sized the requirement at $2T in new annual revenue by 2030 against a 200-gigawatt compute demand. Both analyses raise the same structural question: whether the infrastructure investment precedes, and compels, the application revenue that justifies it — a pattern Gartner explicitly compared to dot-com, energy and telecoms corrections in October 2025, while simultaneously projecting that agentic AI could drive 30% of enterprise application software revenue ($450B+) by 2035. The tension between these positions — necessary correction versus deferred but genuine value — is unresolved in the published record.

CB Insights' annual venture data provides the clearest quantitative map of capital concentration. In 2024, AI represented 37% of venture funding and 17% of deals, both all-time highs, with all five of the year's largest deals going to AI infrastructure players. By full-year 2025, AI had reached 48% of total venture funding ($226B of $469B), with the six largest rounds (OpenAI $41B, Anthropic $32.5B, Scale $14.8B, xAI $12.8B, Databricks $5B, Aligned $5B) accounting for 49% of all AI capital. This concentration is consistent with the compounding-wave thesis — value accrues to the layer that controls the substrate — but it also constitutes the 'externalised harvest' pattern, in that hyperscalers who built their infrastructure during wave two now capture disproportionate returns from wave three without bearing the cost of the open-web corpus on which frontier models were trained.

McKinsey's 2025 State of AI survey and Bain's maturity framework converge on a productivity paradox that mirrors wave-two patterns. McKinsey finds 88% of organisations using AI in at least one function but only 6% qualifying as high performers with measurable EBIT impact, while Bain documents that early leaders achieved 10–25% EBITDA gains by embedding AI in specific workflows rather than distributing it diffusely. The skill categories emerging in wave three — data engineers, ML engineers, prompt engineers, AI ethics specialists and what McKinsey calls 'business–AI translators' — reproduce the pattern of each prior wave inventing its own technical intermediaries (webmaster, cloud architect, data scientist) whose scarcity briefly conferred wage premiums before the skills diffused. Gartner's projection that 80% of engineering workers will require upskilling by 2027, combined with the entry-level labour-market disruption documented in 2025 hiring data, suggests the transition cost is again borne by workers rather than the firms that benefit from the compounding returns.


Sources

ID Title Outlet Date Significance
v1 Why Software Is Eating the World Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) 2011-08 The foundational VC thesis articulating the internet-to-software wave, tracing how falling infrastructure costs (from $150,000/month in 2000 to $1,500/month by 2011) made the cloud era possible, and explicitly predicting that software would disintermediate established industries — a direct precursor to the 'AI is eating software' framing that followed.
v2 AI's $200B Question (Follow the GPUs) Sequoia Capital 2023-09 David Cahn's first quantitative framing of the AI infrastructure revenue gap — requiring $200B in annual end-user revenue to justify then-current GPU capex — introduced the 'follow the GPUs' investment thesis and raised the first structural question about whether the AI wave would compound value or incinerate capital.
v3 AI's $600B Question Sequoia Capital 2024-06 Cahn's updated analysis tripled the required revenue figure to $600B annually as Nvidia's run-rate revenue surged, exposing a structural $500B gap between AI infrastructure investment and demonstrated end-user returns — the most-cited quantitative challenge to the compounding-value thesis.
v4 AI in 2024: From Big Bang to Primordial Soup Sequoia Capital 2024-01 Sequoia's annual AI outlook named the post-ChatGPT frenzy a 'primordial soup' phase, arguing AI requires deeper exploration than SaaS wave substitution and explicitly contrasting AI as a 'revolution' against cloud SaaS as an 'evolution' from on-premise software.
v5 AI in 2025: Building Blocks Firmly in Place Sequoia Capital 2024-12 Sequoia's 2025 outlook maps the consolidation of frontier model competition to five 'finalists' (Microsoft/OpenAI, Amazon/Anthropic, Google, Meta, xAI), frames compute scaling as the next binding constraint, and places the AI wave in relation to prior infrastructure build-outs.
v6 Marc Andreessen made a dire software prediction 15 years ago. Now it's happening in a way nobody imagined Fortune / Morgan Stanley 2026-02 A retrospective audit of Andreessen's 2011 thesis confirming that software did eat retail, media and telecoms as predicted, but that AI is now eating the software layer itself — with Morgan Stanley quantifying unstructured data (over 80% of enterprise information) as the new automation frontier displacing SaaS headcount.
v7 Bain Technology Report 2025: $2 Trillion in New Revenue Needed to Fund AI's Scaling Trend Bain & Company 2025-09 Bain's sixth annual technology report quantifies the AI funding gap as $2T in required annual revenue by 2030 against a global AI compute demand reaching 200 gigawatts, and introduces a four-level agentic maturity framework (information retrieval through multi-agent constellations) as the structural map for the current wave.
v8 AI's Trillion-Dollar Opportunity (Bain Technology Report 2024) Bain & Company 2024-01 Bain's 2024 report places hyperscalers as the dominant first movers in the AI wave, projecting data centre scale growing from 100 megawatts to gigawatts, and frames the cloud infrastructure wave as the direct load-bearing prerequisite for frontier model deployment.
v9 State of the Art of Agentic AI Transformation (Bain Technology Report 2025) Bain & Company 2025-09 Bain's chapter-level analysis of agentic AI maturity identifies compounding errors in multi-step tasks, lack of communication standards, and data silos as the current binding constraints on wave three — directly relevant to the question of what stops compounding from continuing.
v10 McKinsey: Where AI Will Create Value — and Where It Won't McKinsey Global Institute 2025-04 McKinsey's three-wave model (productivity gains, differentiation, transaction-cost reduction) maps AI's compounding economic logic and argues small early advantages in data quality and relevance will compound into 'disproportionate demand' concentration — directly engaging the 'compounding vs harvest' debate.
v11 The Economic Potential of Generative AI: The Next Productivity Frontier McKinsey Global Institute 2023-06 McKinsey's headline market-sizing report places generative AI at $2.6–$4.4 trillion in annual value across 63 use cases, with customer operations, marketing and sales, software engineering, and R&D as the leading categories — providing the quantitative floor for wave-three economic claims.
v12 The State of AI in 2025: Agents, Innovation, and Transformation McKinsey Global Institute 2025-11 McKinsey's annual survey finds 88% of organisations using AI in at least one function (up from 78% in 2024) but only 6% qualifying as high performers with over 5% EBIT impact, while identifying demand for data engineers, ML engineers, prompt engineers and AI ethics specialists as the emerging role categories of wave three.
v13 CB Insights State of AI 2025 Report CB Insights 2026-02 Full-year 2025 AI venture data: over $200B in AI funding with LLM developers (OpenAI, Anthropic, xAI) capturing 41% of investment, AI M&A running at 1.5x 2024 levels, and the frontier model race consolidating into clear 'haves' and 'have-nots' — the clearest quantitative map of wave-three capital concentration.
v14 CB Insights State of Venture 2024 Report CB Insights 2025-01 Documents the milestone year when AI represented 37% of venture funding and 17% of deals — both all-time highs — with all top five venture deals going to AI infrastructure players, marking the shift from software-wave investment patterns to AI-wave capital concentration.
v15 CB Insights State of Venture 2025 Report CB Insights 2026-02 CB Insights' full-year 2025 report records total venture funding at $469B (the highest since 2022), AI accounting for 48% of all funding, and the top six rounds (totalling $111B) all going to AI companies — quantifying the winner-take-most dynamic the compounding thesis predicts.
v16 CB Insights State of Venture Q3'25 Report CB Insights 2025-12 Captures AI exceeding 50% of total venture funding for the first time and notes energy (nuclear, fusion) attracting record investment as hyperscaler power demand becomes the binding constraint — directly evidencing the 'next substrate' question.
v17 Gartner Predicts 40% of Enterprise Apps Will Feature Task-Specific AI Agents by 2026 Gartner 2025-08 Gartner's adoption-curve forecast for agentic AI — from less than 5% of enterprise apps in 2025 to 40% by 2026 and potentially 30% of enterprise application software revenue ($450B+) by 2035 — provides the clearest quantitative adoption-curve framing for wave-three diffusion.
v18 Gartner: AI Agents Will Intermediate More Than $15 Trillion in B2B Purchases by 2028 Gartner / Digital Commerce 360 2025-11 Gartner's most expansive market-sizing claim — 90% of B2B purchases intermediated by AI agents by 2028, channelling over $15 trillion — frames the disintermediation of wave-one distribution patterns through wave-three agentic systems, closing the loop on the three-wave dependency chain.
v19 Gartner Says Agentic AI Supply Exceeds Demand, Market Correction Looms Gartner 2025-10 Gartner's counter-cyclical warning that agentic AI supply already exceeds demand and a market correction is likely provides sceptical ballast to the compounding-value thesis, drawing historical parallels to dot-com, energy and telecoms corrections.
v20 Gartner Forecasts Supply Chain Management Software with Agentic AI Will Grow to $53 Billion by 2030 Gartner 2026-04 The most recent Gartner vertical-specific forecast, tracking agentic AI in supply chain from under $2B in 2025 to $53B by 2030 (60% enterprise adoption), also identifies data-readiness and workforce AI-literacy as the binding constraints on deployment speed.
v21 Gartner Top Strategic Technology Trends for 2025: Agentic AI Gartner 2024-10 Gartner's technology radar placement of agentic AI as the top 2025 strategic trend, framing it as a 'goal-driven digital workforce' and projecting that by 2028 at least 15% of day-to-day work decisions will be made autonomously — the clearest Gartner framing of wave-three as a labour-market event.
v22 CB Insights State of Venture Q1'25 Report CB Insights 2025-05 Documents the Q1 2025 shift in AI dealmaking from infrastructure-dominated investment toward vertical application-layer platforms, with 63% of organisations placing significant importance on AI agents — marking the transition from wave-three infrastructure build-out to application-layer value capture.
v23 The Crunchbase Unicorn Board: Rising Investors Behind the New Unicorn Class Crunchbase 2026-03 Documents 187 new unicorns in 2025 (up 61% year-on-year), with AI-native companies accounting for 25% of the total and Sequoia and a16z dominating early-stage backing — providing the most recent empirical evidence on the rate of new-category creation in wave three.
v24 Bain Technology Report 2025 (Full PDF): AI Leaders Are Extending Their Edge Bain & Company 2025-09 Bain's full sixth annual report, documenting that AI leaders achieved 10–25% EBITDA gains in 2023–24 while laggards fell further behind, and examining how tech giants are competing at every layer — infrastructure, models, platforms, applications — to capture disproportionate value.
v25 Foundation Capital: The AI Hype — $600B Question or $4.6T Opportunity? Foundation Capital 2024-11 Directly rebuts Sequoia's Cahn thesis by expanding the addressable market to include labour costs ($2.3T in sales, marketing, software engineering and HR) plus outsourced IT and business-process services ($2.3T per Gartner), arguing the AI wave is addressing a $4.6T opportunity rather than competing for the existing software market.

We use analytics cookies to understand site usage and improve the service. We do not use marketing cookies.